1996-03-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 2776
SB 105                                                                       
SENATE BILL NO. 105 An Act relating to a requirement that a                    
parent, guardian, or custodian consent before a minor receives an              
abortion; establishing a judicial bypass procedure by which a minor            
may petition a court for authorization to consent to an abortion               
without consent of a parent, guardian, or custodian; amending the              
definition of `abortion'; and amending Alaska Rules of Civil                   
Procedure 40, 53, and 79; Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure 204,             
210, 212, 213, 508, and 512.5; and Alaska Administrative Rule 9                
was read the second time.                                                      
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent for the                      
adoption of the Finance Committee Substitute offered on page 1248.             
Without objection, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(FIN) An Act                      
relating to a requirement that a parent, guardian, or custodian consent        
before certain minors receive an abortion; establishing a judicial             
bypass procedure by which a minor may petition a court for                     
authorization to consent to an abortion without consent of a parent,           
guardian, or custodian; amending the definition of `abortion'; and             
amending Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure 40 and 79; Alaska Rules               
of Appellate Procedure 204, 210, 212, 213, 508, and 512.5; and                 
Alaska Administrative Rule 9 was adopted and read the second                   
time.                                                                          
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be             
considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final            
passage.  Senator Duncan objected.                                             
                                                                               
The question being: Shall the bill be advanced to third reading?               
The roll was taken with the following result:                                  
                                                                               
                                                                               

1996-03-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 2777
SB 105                                                                       
                                                                               
CSSB 105(FIN)                                                                  
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  11   NAYS:  7   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips,               
Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff                  
                                                                               
Excused:  Adams, Green                                                         
                                                                               
and so, the bill failed to advance to third reading.                           
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(FIN) will appear on the March 20                    
calendar.